> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.archways.ai/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Stackgini alternative, Archways Last updated: September 10, 2026 Stackgini automates the front half of the software lifecycle — demand intake, vendor research, solution architecture and portfolio rationalization — for large enterprises. But across its four published solutions, none mention contract renewal dates, auto-renewal clauses or notice periods. If renewals are where your software spend actually gets decided, that's worth knowing before you evaluate the two side by side. ## **​About Stackgini** Stackgini (Stackgini GmbH, based in Germany) positions itself as an "AI operating system for Autonomous Enterprise IT" — a multi-agent system that runs each incoming tech request through intake, requirements analysis, solution design and an auditable approval process. It targets DAX-40 and Fortune 500-scale enterprises, is EU-hosted, and is ISO 27001 and GDPR (DSGVO) certified. Published customer results include 855 hours saved in GETEC's first four months and 70% less effort in software selection at Genoverband. If you're evaluating Stackgini alongside Archways, prioritize checking whether your team's real bottleneck is net-new demand intake (Stackgini's core strength) or the renewal calendar (Archways' core strength) — many enterprises have both problems, just at different points in the year. ## **​At a glance** | | **Archways** | **Stackgini** | | :- | :- | :- | | Renewal & decision support | Yes — timeline and trigger management, triage, portfolio context and a structured renew/renegotiate/replace decision record | Not part of the published solution set — Demand Management, Vendor Selection, Solution Architecture and Portfolio Optimization cover net-new requests and Retain/Retire calls, not contract renewal timing \[NEEDS SOURCE if this exists unpublished] | | Vendor coverage depth | 175,000+ continuously profiled vendors, capability-scored against your requirements | "Billions of verified data points" on tech products via a daily-updated market catalog; a specific vendor count isn't published \[NEEDS SOURCE] | | Auditable decision record | Yes — every evaluation, renewal or consolidation produces a decision record with rationale and trade-offs | Yes — full agent and user action logs, Custom Agent Operating Procedures, and audit-proof documentation across the intake-to-approval workflow | | Solution architecture depth | No — scores and recommends vendors/capability fit, does not generate technical implementation architecture | Yes — a dedicated "Design" capability produces implementation-ready solution architecture options per request | ## **​Renewal & decision support** Verdict: Archways is built around the renewal calendar; Stackgini is built around the request queue. Archways tracks renewal dates, auto-renewal clauses and notice periods, triages what needs action, and resolves every renewal to a documented renew, renegotiate or replace call. Stackgini's four solutions all start from a request or an existing portfolio review, not a contract date — its Portfolio Optimization solution issues Retain/Retire calls on existing apps, but that process isn't described as tied to when a contract actually comes up for renewal. ## **​Vendor coverage depth** Verdict: Different depths of the same claim — Archways publishes a number, Stackgini doesn't. Archways scores any of 175,000+ continuously profiled vendors against a shared capability framework. Stackgini describes "billions of verified data points" on tech products worldwide, refreshed via a daily-updated market catalog, but doesn't publish how many vendors that actually covers — worth asking directly in a demo if vendor breadth matters to your evaluation. ## **​Auditable decision record** Verdict: Both are genuinely strong here, but they audit different things. Stackgini logs every agent and user action across the intake-to-approval workflow — timestamped, threaded, and exportable for audit, backed by ISO 27001-aligned documentation. Archways' decision record instead documents the business call itself: the alternatives considered, the capability fit, and the rationale behind a renew, renegotiate or replace decision. One audits the process; the other audits the decision. ## **​Solution architecture depth** Verdict: A real Stackgini strength Archways doesn't compete on. Stackgini's Design capability produces implementation-ready technical solution architecture per request — genuinely deeper than what Archways offers. Archways stops at vendor scoring and capability fit; it doesn't generate technical architecture or implementation plans. If solution design is a recurring need, that's a point in Stackgini's favor. ## **​Pricing and commercial model** Archways is priced by quote, scoped to your portfolio size — book a demo for a number specific to your estate. Stackgini doesn't publish pricing — there's no pricing page on their site, only demo bookings, consistent with an enterprise, quote-based model aimed at DAX-40/Fortune 500-scale accounts. ## **​Customer evidence** Apollo Partners uses Archways across renewal and evaluation decisions and reports: * Cut evaluation effort by 60% * Built market coverage into every shortlist, sized to Apollo's business * Started every renewal months ahead, not weeks behind "Archways gives us a quick, simple way to understand what's out there — rather than defaulting to the vendors we already know." — Billy Simson, Procurement Manager, Apollo Partners Across the platform, customers going into a renewal with the market mapped and alternatives priced typically see up to 15% off renewal cost, and up to 20% of evaluated tools turn out to already overlap with something already owned. ## **​FAQ** **What is Stackgini?** Stackgini is a German enterprise software platform that uses AI agents to automate IT demand intake, vendor research, solution architecture and portfolio rationalization for large organisations, targeting DAX-40 and Fortune 500-scale accounts. **Does Stackgini handle software renewals?** Not as a published, named solution. Its four solutions — Demand Management, Vendor Selection, Solution Architecture and Portfolio Optimization — are built around new requests and existing-portfolio rationalization, not contract renewal dates or auto-renewal clauses. **Is Archways a good replacement for Stackgini?** It depends on the job. If the priority is automating net-new demand intake and generating technical solution architecture at DAX-40 scale, that's Stackgini's core strength. If the priority is a renewal calendar with a defensible renew/renegotiate/replace decision record, that's what Archways is built for. **Can Archways and Stackgini be used together?** Nothing in either platform's published feature set rules it out — Stackgini's intake-to-architecture workflow and Archways' renewal-and-evaluation workflow cover different points in the software lifecycle, so overlap looks limited based on what's public today. ​Next step Bring a real upcoming renewal or vendor decision. Archways will run it live in 30 minutes, and you keep the output. Book a demo This documentation is built and hosted on [Mintlify](https://mintlify.com), a developer documentation platform.